<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Back To Faith</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.backtofaith.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.backtofaith.com</link>
	<description>Faith that Saves is not Alone?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Credo Review &#8211; How Many Evangelicals Don&#8217;t Believe in Sola Fide?</title>
		<link>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/the-credo-review-how-many-evangelicals-dont-believe-in-sola-fide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/the-credo-review-how-many-evangelicals-dont-believe-in-sola-fide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 22:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblically Speaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backtofaith.com/?p=643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Credo Magazine (not associated with Credo House) published a review of Back to Faith. Credo Magazine describes itself as &#8220;&#8230; self-consciously Evangelical, Reformational, and Baptistic,&#8221; so it stands to reason that they would seek to uphold the tradition found in the cliche [We are saved by faith alone, but the faith that saves is not <p style="float:right;"><a href="http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/the-credo-review-how-many-evangelicals-dont-believe-in-sola-fide/"><em>Read More....</em></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/the-credo-review-how-many-evangelicals-dont-believe-in-sola-fide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Credo Review: MacArthur or Hodges?</title>
		<link>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/630/</link>
		<comments>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/630/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblically Speaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob wilkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith alone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith and works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GES gospel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John MacArther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lordship salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lybrand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zane hodges]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backtofaith.com/?p=630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Credo Magazine (not associated with Credo House) published a review of Back to Faith. Credo Magazine describes itself as &#8220;&#8230; self-consciously Evangelical, Reformational, and Baptistic,&#8221; so it stands to reason that they would seek to uphold the tradition found in the cliche [We are saved by faith alone, but the faith that saves is not <p style="float:right;"><a href="http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/630/"><em>Read More....</em></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/630/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Credo Magazine Review of BACK TO FAITH</title>
		<link>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/credo-magazine-review-of-back-to-faith/</link>
		<comments>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/credo-magazine-review-of-back-to-faith/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:31:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblically Speaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backtofaith.com/?p=621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Credo Magazine (not associated with Credo House) published a review of Back to Faith.  Credo Magazine describes itself as &#8220;&#8230; self-consciously Evangelical, Reformational, and Baptistic,&#8221; so it stands to reason that they would seek to uphold the tradition found in the cliche [We are saved by faith alone, but the faith that saves is not <p style="float:right;"><a href="http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/credo-magazine-review-of-back-to-faith/"><em>Read More....</em></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/credo-magazine-review-of-back-to-faith/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Free: Chapter 2 of Back to Faith on James 2:14 ff</title>
		<link>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/free-chapter-2-of-back-to-faith-on-james-214-ff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/free-chapter-2-of-back-to-faith-on-james-214-ff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 23:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblically Speaking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Resources to Consider]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backtofaith.com/?p=601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hi All,</p> <p>As you know, James 2 is one of the most highly debated sections in the Bible.  If you&#8217;ll sign up for updates at the right &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-&#62;</p> <p>I&#8217;ll send you the entire chapter on James 2 from my book, Back to Faith, absolutely free.  I just want to stay in touch from time to <p style="float:right;"><a href="http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/free-chapter-2-of-back-to-faith-on-james-214-ff/"><em>Read More....</em></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/free-chapter-2-of-back-to-faith-on-james-214-ff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even More Proof that Election / Eternal Security = the &#8220;P&#8221; in TULIP</title>
		<link>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/even-more-proof-that-election-eternal-security-the-p-in-tulip/</link>
		<comments>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/even-more-proof-that-election-eternal-security-the-p-in-tulip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 18:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Biblically Speaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.backtofaith.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here is another example of how Election is tied to the &#8220;P&#8221; in TULIP and is essentially understood to be about Eternal Security.</p> <p>This doctrine [Perseverance] does not stand alone but is a necessary part on the Calvinistic system of theology. The doctrines of Election and Efficacious grace logically imply the certain salvation of those <p style="float:right;"><a href="http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/even-more-proof-that-election-eternal-security-the-p-in-tulip/"><em>Read More....</em></a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.backtofaith.com/biblically-speaking/even-more-proof-that-election-eternal-security-the-p-in-tulip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

